ICT testifies on Capitol Hill on situation in Tibet
On July 25, ICT Vice President Bhuchung Tsering testified at a House Foreign Affairs Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing entitled, “Investigating the Chinese Threat, Part Two: Human Rights Abuses, Torture and Disappearances.”
Tsering spoke of the message of the self-immolators in Tibet, and showed the committee a poster featuring the faces and names of the 44 Tibetans who have set themselves on fire. He said human rights conditions "from a Tibetan perspective have certainly worsened."
Testifying a day after Chinese officials were in Washington to participate in the latest U.S.-China Human Rights Dialogue, Tsering welcomed “such initiatives as they reflect the concern of the American public about the situation in Tibet,” but said "we believe the U.S. Congress and Administration... need to be more proactive."
Responding to the hearing’s focus on Chinese threats, Tsering offered the following recommendations to the Committee:
- pass H.Res. 609, the Tibet resolution, and update the Tibetan Policy Act;
- ask Assistant Secretary Michael Posner to provide a public readout of the Human Rights Dialogue;
- challenge the news blackout in Tibet by funding the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia, expand consular outreach in Tibetan areas, and open a U.S. consulate in Lhasa;
- impose travel restrictions on Chinese delegations as long as travel to Tibet is restricted;
- investigate China’s interference in the internal affairs of Nepal regarding its Tibetan residents;
- Investigate Confucius Institutes and whether they limit free speech on topics such as Tibet; and
- Promote a regional framework on water security regarding rivers that flow from the Tibetan Plateau.
Bhuchung Tsering’s testimony can be read online>
Search
2013 Calendar
![]() |
Available for $7.00 plus shipping and handling: www.savetibetstore.org |
| Tibet: Lhasa and Beyond, takes readers from town to town, offering them a chance to get to know these places and the Tibetans who call them home. Each month features a different hometown, highlighting the significance of the area and juxtaposing it with Tibetans’ political turmoil. | |
